Elizabeth Coleman vs Tori Kinard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 01:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Coleman vs T. Kinard

USA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Coleman 1 - 1 Kinard
They have played 5 sets in total, with Elizabeth Coleman winning 2 and Tori Kinard winning 3. The last match between Elizabeth Coleman and Tori Kinard was at the W35 Orlando, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Elizabeth Coleman getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Coleman | 1 |
| Kinard | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Orlando(11-05-25)
(R2) W15 Orlando(06-20-19)
E. Coleman vs T. Kinard H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,450 |
| 51.16% (22-21) | Career Total W/L | 47.02% (260-293) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Coleman vs T. Kinard Match Preview:
- Recent form indicates that Tori Kinard has a slight advantage on their second serve, winning 1% more points than Elizabeth Coleman. Does this suggest a stronger service game? Yes, it could imply better performance under pressure.
- When it comes to return games, Tori Kinard outperforms Elizabeth Coleman, winning 51.43% of opponents' second serve points compared to Coleman's 47.15%. On first serve returns, Kinard again leads with 38.70% over Coleman's 34.38%.
- In saving breakpoints, Elizabeth Coleman shows resilience, saving a slightly higher percentage at 47.92% compared to Tori Kinard's 43.89%. Could this ability be crucial in tight moments?
- Over the past year, Elizabeth Coleman boasts a stronger win rate in matches, securing victory 73.68% of the time, contrasting with Tori Kinard's 40.74% win rate. What does this indicate about overall competitiveness? It suggests Coleman might be more consistent.
- Surface preferences show Elizabeth Coleman performs best on clay with a 64% win rate, while Tori Kinard prefers grass, also with a 64% success rate. Does surface type influence their probable success in matches?
- Analyzing tournament levels, Elizabeth Coleman excels in Futures and $10K ITF events, while Tori Kinard competes more in Challengers and higher ITF categories. Does this highlight a difference in the level of competition they usually face?
- In head-to-head matchups, Tori Kinard has a lead, having won their only encounter with Coleman decisively in straight sets. Does past performance hint at a psychological advantage?
- When facing higher-ranked opponents, Tori Kinard encounters competitors with a better average rank, suggesting frequent exposure to tougher challenges.
- Deciding set data reveals Elizabeth Coleman has a flawless record in deciding sets over the last year, highlighting her ability to perform under extreme pressure.
- Current event performance, when available, can offer insight into which player has the momentum and form to influence the match's outcome.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match, a focus on recent statistics and playing conditions reveals intriguing dynamics between Elizabeth Coleman and Tori Kinard.
While Tori Kinard has shown a slight edge in both second serve performance and return games in their recent form, Elizabeth Coleman's overall performance and ability to save break points cannot be overlooked. Her capacity to clinch decisive sets showcases a level of mental toughness that could be pivotal in close encounters.
Despite Kinard's success in their previous head-to-head meeting, the context has evolved, with Coleman demonstrating superior match-winning consistency over the past year. Moreover, if the match unfolds into a deciding set, Coleman's unblemished record might give her the upper hand.
Factoring in these statistics and trends, Elizabeth Coleman appears to be the probable victor in this matchup, although the competitive nature between these players suggests a closely contested battle.
Elizabeth Coleman vs Tori Kinard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Coleman vs T. Kinard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 22 | Games Won | 24 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:3:39 | Average Match Time | 2:3:39 |
| 67% (104/156) | 1st Serve % | 65% (84/129) |
| 58% (60/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (53/84) |
| 46% (24/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (9/21) |
| 41% (53/129) | Return Points Win % | 46% (72/156) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Coleman Recent Matches Played
T. Kinard Recent Matches Played

E. Coleman vs T. Kinard Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.16% (22/21) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.02% (260/293) |
| 49.46% (46/47) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.29% (608/651) |
| 50.18% (413/410) | Games Win/Loss | 49.92% (5749/5767) |
| 57.14% (12/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.63% (137/177) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.58% (49/46) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.52% (52/53) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 56.41% (22/17) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 23 | Aces Total | 283 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 87 | Total Double Faults | 885 |
| 1:1:43 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 410.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 568.12 |
| 67% (1047/1554) | 1st Serve % | 65% (10812/16538) |
| 59% (617/1047) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (6302/10812) |
| 44% (225/507) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2536/5724) |
| 49% (79/160) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (948/2043) |
| 43% (658/1532) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7586/16863) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 15.38% (2/11) |
| 33.33% (7/14) | Challenger W/L | 45.64% (178/212) |
| 68.18% (15/7) | Futures W/L | 53.38% (79/69) |
| 51% (22/43) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (252/537) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 43% (3/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (45/105) |
| 71% (5/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (69/162) |
| 100% (18/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (278/229) |
| 0% (18/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (278/48) |
| 16% (25/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (275/29) |